注册 登录
滑铁卢中文论坛 返回首页

风萧萧的个人空间 http://kwcg.ca/bbs/?61910 [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS]

日志

书评《别学加拿大 一个国家如何把所有事都做错了》

已有 5 次阅读2026-9-11 04:58 |个人分类:Tristin Hopper

评析“近期的政治荒谬现象”


2025年12月16日

https://www.thebcreview.ca/2025/12/16/2766-lacey-hopper/

《别学加拿大:一个国家如何把所有事都做错了》(*Don’t Be Canada: How One Country Did Everything Wrong All At Once*)
Tristin Hopper 常驻维多利亚市的《国家邮报》(National Post)记者兼专栏作家

多伦多:萨瑟兰出版社(Sutherland House),2025年

书评人:尤金·莱西(Eugene Lacey)

毫无疑问,许多加拿大读者看到特里斯汀·霍珀(Tristin Hopper)这本新书的标题——《别学加拿大:一个国家如何把所有事都做错了》——时,可能会本能地感到刺耳或尴尬(甚至做出防御性的姿态)。另一些人则可能报以冷笑,因为书中的观点为他们对现任政府的指责提供了某种“文学上的正当性”支持。作为这位常驻维多利亚市的专栏作家的首部著作,本书旨在直面一系列令加拿大尴尬的话题:这些问题虽已充分暴露,却往往被刻意回避。该书出版的时机极具挑衅意味,正值美国总统重提“吞并”加拿大的言论之际;然而,它同时也显得尤为切中时弊。在许多方面,本书嘲讽了加拿大的一种心态:即利用美国遭人诟病之处,来为无视本国自身缺陷寻找借口。加拿大政界迎合美国进步主义思潮的愿望,催生了种种“作秀式”政策,进而引发了实际问题。无论读者是否认同书中的争议性观点——毕竟政治立场难免会影响读者对霍珀(一位为保守派媒体《国家邮报》撰稿的作家)的看法——该书在揭示加拿大人日益增长的不满情绪方面,仍具有相当的价值。对于那些想要了解加拿大如何从一个“令世界感到乏味”的国家转变为焦点话题的人来说,这本书提供了一次充满讽刺意味且发人深省的剖析。

面对政治不满情绪,许多加拿大人有一种近乎强迫性的反应,那就是指出“其实到处情况都很糟糕”。例如,高昂的生活成本——这是困扰加拿大年轻人的诸多问题中的典型代表——在世界各地的自由民主国家中也呈上升趋势。《别学加拿大》一书对这种将加拿大与世界其他民主国家进行宽泛类比的做法提出了质疑。其核心论点在于:加拿大在某些方面的错误做法是独一无二的;为了迎合美国的进步主义心态,该国主动采取了种种自毁式的举措。基于这一视角,霍珀(Hopper)探讨了一系列充满争议的话题,包括“协助死亡医疗”(MAID)、刑事司法改革、减少伤害策略以及审查制度立法。本书并非要全盘否定这些议题背后的善意初衷,而是试图揭示加拿大在一种半无意识的狂热情绪驱使下,已在这些问题上走向了何种极端。霍珀列举了一个极具代表性的例子:英国在探讨本国“协助死亡医疗”政策方案时,明确将加拿大视为一个应当引以为戒的“令人不安”的案例。由于侧重于从外部视角审视加拿大,霍珀得以跳出加拿大社会那种极力回避政治分歧话题的惯例。加拿大人通常认为自己身处一个鲜少受人关注的国家——一个在世界舞台上以身作则的典范。尽管国内政治可能风起云涌,但从历史上看,加拿大在国际上始终保持着一种温和、平淡却又颇具吸引力的形象。事实上,加拿大长期以来给人的印象就像是“茶壶里的风暴”——看似喧嚣,实则无伤大雅。然而在霍珀看来,这只茶壶已经破裂,风暴正从中倾泻而出。

读者或许会问:加拿大在海外日益形成的这种“滑稽且无能”的形象,是否带有政治动机的夸大成分?人们可能会想,美国总统唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)那些具有破坏性和分裂性的举动,加上拜登(Biden)政府给人留下的无力感,难道不应反衬出加拿大是一个能干且善于合作的替代选择吗?特朗普总统确实既让许多加拿大人团结起来反对他,又通过对比让加拿大政客显得格外亲和友善。然而,他也同时极大地分散了人们对加拿大自身进行反思的注意力。本书第二章题为“在身份政治上胜过美国人”,正是针对这一问题展开论述的。霍珀指出,加拿大一心想要提供一种与特朗普治下的美国截然不同的“进步主义”替代方案,结果导致其言论不断升级,却缺乏相应的问责机制。这种倾向最终演变成加拿大政府承认自己犯下了持续性的种族灭绝罪行,却未受到任何惩罚,也未面临任何起诉的前景。这种将加拿大的政治声誉与美国进步主义捆绑的做法,可能会给人一种虚假的自信感。美国的左翼民粹主义者——尤其是无党派参议员兼前总统候选人伯尼·桑德斯(Bernie Sanders)——继续盛赞加拿大的医疗保健体系,而与此同时,加拿大人却不得不等待近24小时才能获得医院床位。随着近期来自总统的吞并威胁日益抬头

无论是对于特朗普还是阿尔伯塔的分离主义者而言,将关于加拿大种种弊病的讨论与美国政治语境剥离开来都至关重要。尽管霍珀(Hopper)在书中使用了“defense”和“license”等美式拼写,这或许在一定程度上削弱了“去美国化”这一论述基调,但这丝毫不影响其核心观点的表达。

阅读《别做加拿大》(*Don’t Be Canada*)一书,并不要求读者持守特定的政治立场。即便不完全认同霍珀关于加拿大现状的论断,读者依然能意识到探讨他所提出的议题及其后果的价值。书中贯穿的幽默风格或许会让部分读者感到这是一种挑衅。然而,必须认识到,霍珀对加拿大政策的这种嘲讽式评价并非凭空捏造。这正是本书虽篇幅短小、却在末尾附带详尽注释的价值所在。本书的受众是加拿大人,他们习惯了在国际舞台上不被嘲讽,以至于需要确凿的证据才能改变看法。诚然,加拿大长期以来享有一种“平淡无奇却讨喜”的国际声誉——《新共和》(*The New Republic*)杂志曾戏称“有价值的加拿大倡议”(Worthwhile Canadian Initiative)是有史以来最无聊的新闻标题。然而,加拿大人已无法再安享这种舒适感。《别做加拿大》既不适合那些寻求解决加拿大问题方案的人,也不适合那些希望全面评估特鲁多政府政策议程的人。不过,对于那些想知道为何加拿大许多人似乎总是怒气冲冲的读者来说,这本书提供了一份既易于理解又显然经过深入研究的综述。尽管霍珀在不到一百页的篇幅内涉猎广泛,难免以牺牲分析深度为代价换取内容的广度,但他对加拿大近期政治荒诞现象的考察,在引导读者了解当今时代那些鲜少被关注的争议方面,总体上是成功的。

*

尤金·“轰炸机”·莱西(Eugene "Bomber" Lacey)
尤金·莱西年轻时曾在不列颠哥伦比亚省南部担任公交车司机;由于他驾驶车辆在沿海地区与内陆地区之间往返穿梭时速度极快,因而获得了“轰炸机”(Bomber)这一绰号。 1983年,他因沿“乌鸦巢公路”(Crowsnest Highway)创下从普林斯顿(Princeton)到温哥华(Vancouver)的最快行程纪录,而被授予尤尔特·鲍尔林奖章(Ewart Bowering Medal)。此后,他曾在奥肯那根学院(Okanagan College)修读政治学课程,随后在纳尔逊(Nelson)的圣母大学(Notre Dame University)获得了硕士学位。如今他已退休,在奇尔科廷高原(Chilcotin Plateau)过着宁静的生活,同时也花大量时间上网冲浪。这是他首次为《不列颠哥伦比亚评论》(The British Columbia Review)撰稿。欢迎加入《评论》,Bomber Lacey!

Reviewing ‘recent political absurdities’

December 16, 2025

https://www.thebcreview.ca/2025/12/16/2766-lacey-hopper/​


Don’t Be Canada: How One Country Did Everything Wrong All At Once
by Tristin Hopper    2025

Reviewed by Eugene Lacey

Doubtless, many Canadian readers will wince with their elbows up at the title of Tristin Hopper’s Don’t Be Canada: How One Country Did Everything Wrong All At Once. Others may smirk, relishing in the literary vindication of their recriminations of the current government. This book, the first from the Victoria-based columnist, seeks to confront its audience with all the uncomfortable topics of issue that Canada has proven exceptional at displaying without acknowledging. The timing of this title is indeed incendiary, coming at a period which has seen the resurgence of annexationist rhetoric from the President of the United States; however, it is also incredibly pertinent. This book in many ways derides the Canadian impulse to use American disfavour to justify turning a blind eye to our own country’s shortcomings. A Canadian political desire to appeal to American progressivism has fueled performative policies that have caused real issues. Whether or not one agrees with the points of contention – political interests will inevitably influence the reader’s view of Hopper, a writer for the conservative National Post – there is considerable value in the way this book illuminates the rising dissatisfaction among Canadians. This book will prove a useful read as a sardonic and provocative examination into how Canada stopped being boring to the world.

A common, almost compulsive response of many Canadians to expressions of political discontent is to point out that things are really quite bad everywhere. For example, the high cost of living, which is totemic of the myriad of problems that young Canadians are facing, is on the rise in liberal democracies around the world. Don’t Be Canada contests such a generous comparison between Canada and the rest of the democratic world. Its very basis is that Canada is unique in doing a number of things wrong, voluntarily engaging in self-destructive activities in an attempt to appeal to a progressive American mindset. In this vein, Hopper runs the gamut of controversial topics, including Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID), criminal justice reform, harm reduction, and censorship legislation. This book is not an outright denunciation of the sympathies behind these causes but rather attempts to show the extremities to which Canada has strayed in a semi-conscious fervour. As an emblematic illustration Hopper cites the United Kingdom, who, in exploring policy options for their own version of MAID, highlighted Canada as a “disturbing” (viii) example to avoid. With a focus on how Canada appears from the outside looking in, Hopper gives himself the ability to ignore the Canadian social convention strongly avoiding divisive political topics. Canadians are generally taught to think of themselves as a country little thought about – a country that leads by example on the world stage. Though domestic politics might rage like a storm, Canadians have historically been able to rely on a benign, boring, yet attractive image abroad. Indeed, Canada’s comfortable historic reputation is that of a tempest in a teapot. As Hopper has it, the teapot is cracked, and the tempest is leaking out.

Downey 2. Tristin Hopper
Victoria-based National Post reporter and columnist Tristin Hopper

The reader may ask themselves whether the comically inept image of Canada developing abroad is a politically motivated exaggeration. Surely, one might think, the disruptive and divisive actions of the US President, Donald Trump, and the incapacitated image of the Biden presidency, have made Canada to appear as a competent and cooperative alternative? President Trump has indeed both united many Canadians against him and made Canadian politicians look incredibly cordial by comparison. However, he has simultaneously served as a major distraction in the way of Canada’s own self-criticism. This book’s second chapter, “Outdoing the Americans at Identity Politics,” alludes to this very problem. As Hopper characterises it, Canada’s singular focus on providing a progressive alternative to Trump’s America resulted in escalatory statements with little to no plan of accountability. This culminated in the Canadian government’s admittance of its own guilt in committing an ongoing genocide without the imposition of any consequences or to prospect of any prosecutions. This focus on pinning Canada’s political reputation to American progressivism can give people a false sense of confidence. American populists on the left, notably Independent Senator and former presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, continue to laud Canada’s healthcare system while Canadians are made to wait for nearly 24 hours for hospital beds. With the recent rise of annexationist threats coming from President Trump and Albertan separatists alike, it is important to untether the conversation on Canada’s failings from American political contexts. Perhaps the focus of de-Americanising our discourse is slightly impinged by Hopper’s use of American spellings for words like “defense” and “license,” but that hardly distracts from the overall point being made.

One need not subscribe to any particular political position in order to read Don’t Be Canada. One need not agree with Mr. Hopper’s contentions about the state of this country in order to recognise the value of discussing the issues and consequences he raises. The humour with which this book is infused may indeed strike some readers as a provocation. However, it is important to realise that Hopper does not pull this ridiculing assessment of Canadian policy out of thin air. Such is the value of the relatively lengthy notes section at the back of this relatively short book. This book addresses a Canadian audience that is so unacquainted to derision on the world stage that it requires hard evidence to be convinced otherwise. Indeed, Canada has long enjoyed an international reputation of being pleasantly charmless –  The New Republic once christened “Worthwhile Canadian Initiative” to be “the most boring headline ever written.” However, this is a comfort that Canadians can no longer rely on. Don’t Be Canada is not for those who want answers to Canada’s problems, nor is it for those wanting a balanced assessment of the Trudeau government’s policy agenda. However, for those who want to know the reasons why so many people in Canada seem to be so angry all the time, this book provides a summary that is both digestible and evidently researched. While covering a lot of territory in under one hundred pages, sacrificing depth of analysis for breadth of content, Hopper’s survey of Canada’s recent political absurdities largely succeeds in its goal of guiding its reader through the underacknowledged controversies of our time.

Downey 4. 'Bomber' Lacey, aka Mackie, Richard Ernest cropped
Eugene "Bomber" Lacey

As a young man, Eugene Lacey worked as a bus driver in southern British Columbia where he earned his nickname, Bomber, for his speedy transit between coast and Interior. In 1983, he was awarded the Ewart Bowering medal for the fastest trip between Princeton and Vancouver on the Crowsnest Highway. Later he enrolled in political science courses at Okanagan College before earning a Master's degree from Notre Dame University in Nelson. Now retired, he lives quietly on the Chilcotin Plateau and spends too much time surfing the web. This is his first contribution to The British Columbia Review. Welcome to the Review, Bomber Lacey!


路过

鸡蛋

鲜花

握手

雷人

评论 (0 个评论)

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

法律申明|用户条约|隐私声明|手机版|小黑屋|联系我们|www.kwcg.ca

GMT-5, 2026-9-11 13:38 , Processed in 0.013587 second(s), 15 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2021 Comsenz Inc.  

返回顶部